Latest Law Related Forum Topics:

  • Fingerprints for food stamps? (1 post)
  • Can i fight one citation and go to traffic school for the other? (3 posts)
  • being watched by the cops? (17 posts)
  • The local police want me to come in to talk with them re: "court". Does that mean I will be arrested? (4 posts)
  • Fake Police? (9 posts)
  • Do you think R.Kelly should go to jail? (19 posts)
  • 25 years in the slammer? (4 posts)
  • Can a city COP get a ticket from a CHP while on patrol? (12 posts)
  • Can a male police officer force a female out the car if he stops her for no seatbelt, and no female cop there? (10 posts)
  • What are your thoughts on anarchy, can you name a positive and a negative effect it would have on society? (5 posts)
  • prison visitation form, room for only 1 charge? (5 posts)
  • My son was involved in a hit and run saturday,? (4 posts)
  • I ran a red light by accident. Help!!!? (8 posts)
  • I want him arrested? (10 posts)
  • Are the people who oppose nudity claiming it is to protect kids just hopeless prudes themselves? Why imply to- (14 posts)
  •  
    Author Message

    Snowflake

    Members


    Online status

    292 posts

    Location: Virgin Islands (u.s.)
    Occupation: Redsmith
    Age:

    #27518   2007-10-24 10:51 GMT      
    in the event of a situation in which a majority of representatives are suddenly unable to serve?

    There is a detailed line of succession for the presidency. Vice-presidents can be replaced also, under the 25th Amendment. Senators can, I believe, be replaced by the governor of their state if there is a death, resignation, etc. But as far as I'm aware, the only way to replace a congressman is through a special election, which always takes time.

    Shouldn't we have some kind of procedure for replacing congressmen, even temporarily, in the event many of them are suddenly unable to serve? Yes, I am thinking of a terrorist attack, among other things. It's possible that we could be left without sufficient leadership just when we needed it most. Those concerned about presidential power should also want a way to re-convene the House as well as the Senate quickly, also.

    Does anyone know if there are any laws already in this regard?

    Thanks.

    NoOne

    Members


    Online status

    278 posts

    Location: Ireland
    Occupation: Stringer
    Age:

    #27519   2007-10-24 10:55 GMT      
    I support it 100%.
    Who the heck wouldn't?

    Paperclip

    Members


    Online status

    241 posts

    Location: Turkmenistan
    Occupation: Firefighter
    Age:

    #27520   2007-10-24 10:55 GMT      
    We already have that the Governor of a state appoints someone it used to be the Gov. would appoint both Senators which was a huge gift.

    Cocktail

    Members


    Online status

    263 posts

    Location: Chile
    Occupation: Weaponsmith
    Age:

    #27521   2007-10-24 10:56 GMT      
    If it comes to the point where most of Congress is incapacitated by a terrorist attack--------we've got bigger problems that not having a functional Congress.

    Nightlife

    Members


    Online status

    255 posts

    Location: Macedonia
    Occupation: Anthropologist
    Age:

    #27522   2007-10-24 10:56 GMT      
    There are actually already protocols in place to rebuild the government in the event that something should occur that decimated the ranks of any of the branches.

    Limey

    Members


    Online status

    266 posts

    Location: Lesotho
    Occupation: Real estate investor
    Age:

    #27523   2007-10-24 11:07 GMT      
    It is already in place. Did you not read the Larry Craig stories? The Governor of Idaho was ready to name his replacement if he resigned. Thats who names new congressmen if they cannot finish their terms.

    TakeItEasy

    Members


    Online status

    267 posts

    Location: India
    Occupation: Fire marshal
    Age:

    #27524   2007-10-24 11:08 GMT      
    "I am happy to report that TWO of your three branches of government are still functional, and that AIN'T bad!" ~ Jack Nicholson, "Mars Attacks"

    David

    Members


    Online status

    248 posts

    Location: Turks And Caicos Islands
    Occupation: Hosier
    Age:

    #27525   2007-10-24 11:09 GMT      
    We already have such a procedure --- they are called state laws and most require an early election.

    Contageous

    Members


    Online status

    230 posts

    Location: Czech Republic
    Occupation: Percussionist
    Age:

    #27526   2007-10-24 11:10 GMT      
    The Senators and Congressmen are elected by the respective states. Federal Law does not govern how they are selected, State laws do. Every state already has a contingency rule in place. Usually, the Governor appoints one until the next election.

    -

    PrehistoricSwimmer

    Members


    Online status

    254 posts

    Location: Nepal
    Occupation: Agronomist
    Age:

    #27527   2007-10-24 11:18 GMT      
    You don't need to worry about this - the processes are in place and have been for well over a century.

    These replacements are not governed by the constitution itself but rather by individual state constitutions and laws.

    Most states allow for an early election or an appointment by the Governor of that state. Some allow the Spouse the option to take over.

    I guess we should start this process since Congress is already non-functional

    FrostFlake

    Members


    Online status

    244 posts

    Location: Montserrat
    Occupation: Crofter
    Age:

    #27528   2007-10-24 11:26 GMT      
    You raise a very important concern; I am not aware of any plans in place in the tragic event that we lost a lot of members of congress. A well-timed nuclear attack on DC could very well leave us with no leadership. That would be horrible, and so is not having a plan to deal with such awful unexpected events. Something needs to be put in place; maybe the runner up in the election for each seat would be on board to take the current incumbent's place in the event something happens? Any type of special elections would take time and be chaotic, and I am surprised no contingency plan exists in the event of a terrible emergency that would leave us without leadership.

    Edit: apparently I am wrong, a plan does exist, but I think something should exist in the event that many congressman are lost at one time. Each state has their own rules, and I think policies should exist that govern what happens if many of our officials were lost.
    > 1 <